The Reflection allows instructors to critically analyze the feedback given by the reviewer. In addition, the instructor should contemplate how the feedback might be used to enhance teaching and ...

Student evaluations of teaching (SET) are a popular measure of teaching effectiveness, which center students’ perspectives. However, research shows that SET scores have limitations, including ...

To incorporate near-peer teaching into a curriculum, use a planning and implementation framework to design your curriculum. Take the following questions into consideration: Now that you have planned ...

Peer shadowing holds significant importance in improving the teaching effectiveness of instructors, as it provides a platform for instructors to engage in reflective practice, allowing them to ...

Each journal has a somewhat unique system for reviewing papers, and each paper will have a unique journey through a journal?s reviewing machinery. But I?ve learned that even though peer review has ...

Before a medical paper gets published (as my expertise is only in medicine, this post is focussed on medical papers), it normally gets reviewed by external experts. These experts often recommend minor ...

In 2023, an academic journal, the Annals of Operations Research, retracted an entire special isssue because the peer review process for it was compromised. The case brought into sharp focus broader ...

Peer review is a central feature of academic work. It’s the process through which research ends up published in an academic journal: independent experts scrutinise the work of another researcher in ...

Peer teaching and learning encompasses a range of approaches in which medical students adopt both learner and educator roles to facilitate each other’s acquisition of knowledge, skills and ...

In response to the Closing Bell article in Jan. 27, 2003, 1 I often think that the peer review system being blinded only one way (i.e., against the submitter but not the reviewer) is flawed and should ...