Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹1.53 crore Section 68 addition, holding demonetisation-period SBN receipts were repayments of existing ...
GSTAT Thiruvananthapuram sets aside GST proceedings against deceased proprietor and allows 2017-18 ITC under retrospective ...
FAST-DS 2026 offers foreign asset disclosure relief, but valuation thresholds and lack of FEMA immunity create significant ...
Andhra Pradesh HC sets aside composite GST assessment order covering 2019-20 to 2021-22 and permits separate proceedings for ...
Gujarat HC quashes Section 148 reopening after finding that the alleged ₹14.14 lakh payment was actually an opening balance.
ITAT Bangalore deleted Rs.14,99,56,916 section 40(a)(i) disallowance, holding the second proviso retrospective and a payee loss return sufficient.
CHA Cannot Be Penalised for Importer’s Misdeclaration Without Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT Kolkata
CESTAT Kolkata sets aside penalties under Sections 112 and 114AA against CHA Arghya Sengupta in Paraquat misdeclaration case.
Mumbai ITAT holds Section 153A valid in coordinated search, limits on-money to assessee-owned shops, and sustains ₹6.09 lakh under Section 69A.
Gujarat HC quashes Section 148 notice for AY 2013-14, finding reopening based on incorrect facts, no new tangible material ...
CESTAT Hyderabad allows refund of reverse-charge CENVAT credit, orders correct computation and invoice verification for remaining claims.
CESTAT Kolkata quashes Section 112(a)(ii) penalty after rejecting the principal customs allegations against the importer.
ITAT Bangalore condoned a 247-day delay, admitted the appeal and remanded the section 271AAC penalty dispute to CIT(A)/NFAC.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results