For more than a decade, litigation over glyphosate-based herbicides has sat at the intersection of federal pesticide regulation, state tort ...
Backlash grows after Supreme Court shields Monsanto; Zeldin’s response reveals tensions surrounding glyphosate's safety and ...
Chemical giant Monsanto has argued for years that if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approves a pesticide label ...
The U.S. Supreme Court, on a 7-2 vote, sided with Monsanto, ruling states cannot exceed the federal government’s labeling requirements for Roundup in agricultural practices. The case is known as ...
Opinion
4don MSNOpinion
NZ’s approval of Roundup relies on industry-funded reviews currently under investigation
Last month’s US Supreme Court ruling in favour of the makers of the weedkiller Roundup (formerly Monsanto, now owned by German pharmaceuticals group Bayer) upended thousands of lawsuits based on the ...
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 7:2 landmark ruling in the Durnell Roundup™ case on Thursday, affirming that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) expressly preempts ...
Ruling should help significantly contain litigation by preempting conflicting state-law- based warning claims Decision provides regulatory clarity for crop input producers, American farmers and ...
LEVERKUSEN, Germany, June 25, 2026--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The U.S. Supreme Court decision is good for science, farmers, and industries that depend on regulatory clarity for innovation. It should help ...
Trump’s Freedom 250 shadow organization was a vehicle for soliciting political donations, a new report contends.
Decision in Monsanto v. Durnell holds that states cannot require pesticide manufacturers to add warnings to their products beyond those approved by the US EPA ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results